Over the last two months several news stories appeared in the national media that could not have sent more mixed messages on the future of real estate in Austin, Texas.
First, Fiserv Case Shiller released its findings on the 15 housing markets in the U.S. which they think will experience the lowest appreciation rates over the next five years: Austin tied (with Waterloo-Cedar Falls, Iowa) for number nine on that list. The national headlines for this story generally read, “The Fifteen Worst Housing Markets for the Next Five Years.” That headline was certain to turn heads, and it did.
Several days later, at the other extreme, Forbes released a study ranking cities they expected to be the “boom towns” over the next decade based on job growth and demographic trends. You guessed it, Austin was at the top of that list. Although the subject matter for each study was slightly different, someone reading both headlines could not help but be a bit confused over the near term direction of the Austin economy and its housing market.
Why the apparent huge disparity in these rankings for Austin? While a quick reading of the headlines from the major news outlets certainly did not provide the answer, a closer read of many of the published articles on the studies does provide some clarity on the issue.
The Fiserv Case Shiller study identified the housing markets that are expected to appreciate at an annualized rate of less than 1.5% (or 7.5% over the next five years), a rate The Business Insider referred to as a “pretty lousy investment.” While this might be true in some circles, if you were to achieve this type of return on your home you would be better off than a savings account at most banks, and better still if you considered the potential tax benefits of owing your home. Regardless, the study ranked Austin the ninth worst housing market in the U.S. over the next five years, with an expected 1.2% annualized growth rate from 2011 to 2016.
While my review of the various articles citing the Fiserv Case Shiller study did not uncover the methodology used in their analysis, it would not be surprising that the markets at the top of the list (those expected to have the lowest appreciation rates) would be those that did not experience the boom and bust in home pricing like many markets in Florida, Nevada, Arizona and California during the last decade. This would explain why Austin might make this list. However, both Miami and Fort Lauderdale Florida are ranked in the top four markets expected to experience the lowest growth rates in home prices over the next four years. According to Fiserv Case Shiller, home values in both Miami and Fort Lauderdale dropped by more than 50% between 2005 and 2010, with Miami actually expected to have no appreciation over the next five years.
While my point is not to make a forecast of what home appreciation rates will be in Austin over the next five years, in my opinion anyone reading the numerous headlines generated from the Fiserv Case Shiller article could easily speculate that buying a home in Austin would not be a sound investment in the coming years.
At the other extreme are the various headlines from the Forbes study proclaiming Austin to be at the top of the list of the next boom towns. In developing their ranking, Forbes reportedly evaluated historic job growth trends, demographic factors such as population growth, family formation, growth in educated migration, as well as a broad measure of attractiveness to immigrants. While all of these factors certainly played a key role in Austin’s strong economic growth during the mid-1990’s and most of the last decade, the region is not immune to larger global and national economic forces that can and have negatively impacted our economy and housing market. The most recent example is 2009 when the region lost over 18,000 jobs. Furthermore, the job outlook over the next two years is not stellar considering layoffs which will occur in the state and local government sectors as a result of budget shortfalls.
As someone who has studied the Austin economy and its real estate market for over 26 years, a time horizon that has included several major economic cycles (both positive and negative), I’m always leery when I read a headline that includes the words “boom town.” While an analysis of past economic and housing statistics for any market will generally reveal large changes in market conditions over an extended period of time, most experts will not revert to using terms like “boom” or “bust” when referring to future events that may – or may not – transpire.
But, using these words can sure make for a catchy headline …